Monthly Archives: July 2011

Pet Owners and Their Skewed Perception of Cleanliness

This may be my cutest and most controversial post to date.

I believe that in general, or, to put it another way, in large part, pet owners have learned to live at a level of cleanliness that is below the majority of non-pet owners.  They have allowed animals to walk on their carpets, sleep in their beds, and shed hair like Sampson with a crush.  For today’s discussion I am focusing on the two main types of pets, cats and dogs.  So if you have fish or a turtle, you can just sit back without a care in your clean chair.

Here is a real-life story that should serve to illustrate my point.  I won’t mention any names.

I knew someone who had a dog.  This dog was beloved and treated as a member of the family.  I cared for this dog, even though he seemed to want to kill me every time I saw him.  He had heart, and I believe we had an understanding.  Anyway, this dog was allowed to rest on one of the couches in the living room.

The lady of the house believed in cleanliness.  She hired a maid to come by the house once a week to vacuum, dust, and generally keep the place sparkling.  I will say that the house has always been kept in good order.  But they had a dog.  And this dog had hair.

One day the lady of the house noticed that I was not sitting on the couch.  She asked me about it.  I responded that I noticed the couch was loaded with dog hair, and I didn’t want it to get all over my clothes.  She appeared shocked and troubled by this.  How could a house devoted to cleanliness have a piece of furniture too dirty to sit on comfortably?  The answer is a skewed perception of cleanliness.

If someone lives on or near a farm with cows, chances are they will eventually develop a greater tolerance to the smell of manure.  A passerby will get punched in the nose by the odor, but those subjected to the smells on a daily basis will grow increasingly numb to it.  It’s incredible what human beings can adapt to.

When you take a furry animal into your home, you are accepting a decreased level of cleanliness.  Fur (or hair, or any thin strands of animal) will cling to everything.  You might fight the good fight with dusters and vacuums, but in the end you will lose.  Hair will continue to poke into the fibers, and dander will float around until it enters your nostrils.  Eventually, constant exposure and love for your pet will blind you from the unclean reality.  Your tolerance for filth will increase out of necessity.

Your perception becomes skewed.

And people won’t want to sit on your couches.

 

Hackers: Holding the World Accountable Without Any Accountability

This post is in response to a post by Curtis Entenmann called 1s and Os.  I encourage you to read his post before reading this one.  And if you haven’t looked at our posts on Equality yet (Mine and His) , I would encourage you to take a look see.

Curtis wrote about an anonymous hacker group called LulzSec.  I gathered some info from a few news sites and found a statement issued by the group, which they posted in honor of their 1000th tweet.  Read the statement here to see what they are saying.   This group recently completed a 50 day hacking spree that resulted in attacks on Sony, Nintendo, the CIA and many other institutions.  According to their statement, if we are to read it as any indication of what actually motivates them (who knows?)  they seem compelled to educate the pitiful masses of how vulnerable and ignorant they are, and they are not apologizing for finding the whole thing entertaining.  They have compromised the security and privacy of millions, and they say things like the following:(This is graphic, but I don’t want to censor it so you can see the caliber of people we’re dealing with)

Yes, yes, there’s always the argument that releasing everything in full is just as evil, what with accounts being stolen and abused, but welcome to 2011. This is the lulz lizard era, where we do things just because we find it entertaining. Watching someone’s Facebook picture turn into a penis and seeing their sister’s shocked response is priceless. Receiving angry emails from the man you just sent 10 dildos to because he can’t secure his Amazon password is priceless. You find it funny to watch havoc unfold, and we find it funny to cause it. We release personal data so that equally evil people can entertain us with what they do with it.

I get a sense that they are saying things like this and doing things to evoke a response from the masses.  Perhaps they want to show them how corrupt their leaders and institutions are, and in the meantime make a commentary on how sick and twisted human nature is.  So, like a preachy alt-rock band in the likes of Tool or Slipknot, they are making it an art form to tell the people how messed up their world is.

Here is what they said at the end of their 50 day hacking spree:

Our planned 50 day cruise has expired, and we must now sail into the distance, leaving behind – we hope – inspiration, fear, denial, happiness, approval, disapproval, mockery, embarrassment, thoughtfulness, jealousy, hate, even love,” the group wrote. “If anything, we hope we had a microscopic impact on someone, somewhere. Anywhere.

What is their purpose?  What do they want?  WHO ARE THEY?

Curtis supports their efforts to expose corruption.  He writes, “I for one am all for these “hackers” who aim to expose the corruption around us. A government should fear it’s people, not the other way around.”   Curtis then goes on to say that hackers could even go further by going after our own government and financial institutions.  He believes that it is better to expose corruption in this manner than to live under the influence of it.

Here is my response.

LulzSec and other hackers who act in a similar fashion could have any number of motives.  These motives could be pure and true, or they could be twisted and self-serving.  They are viewed by some as modern-day freedom fighters, exposing the corruption behind our powerful leaders and institutions.  They are viewed by others as criminals, internet vigilantes who put personal and national security at risk.  Very well.  But none of what I just said matters.  Here’s why.

Hackers pride themselves on holding the world accountable to whatever standard they believe they should be held to.  But they themselves cannot be held accountable for their actions because they are anonymous.  I don’t care how righteous or evil they are at the core, they are nameless, faceless, reckless, and dangerous.  Action, any action, without accountability is only subject to the whims of the individual.  And if you take this total lack of accountability and you add the massive amount of power at the fingertips of these individuals, you get worrisome results.

That doesn’t mean that they do not serve some good purpose.  We live in a world where our identities (the personal information that makes up part of our identity) exist on computers.  Too many of us do not understand how vulnerable we are to the leaders and institutions that control our information.  Hackers understand our vulnerability better than most.  Many of them want to expose our dangerous ignorance.  I get that. And that message should be delivered to the people.

But once again, I cannot support the actions of individuals who operate without accountability, and who exercise so much power to disrupt or topple structures which make up our society.

Three Brief Thoughts: Evil Jargon, Good Quotes, and Great Books

Evil Jargon

If there is one thing that I aspire to in my writing, it is clarity.  I want to think clear thoughts, and I want to write clear words.  With clarity comes a better glimpse of the truth.  Language has such a power to communicate the truth of our existence, but it also has an unmatched power to blind us from the same truth.  We build mighty walls around our minds and hearts with empty words mortared by ignorance.  And, unfortunately, we are guilty of building the same walls around those with whom we interact.  When we resort to jargon (words used by a particular group that have  little meaning to outsiders) we put up more walls.  Jargon is in direct conflict with the truth found in Christianity.  Only a fool, or a young child would build walls just to break them down and build them again.  Jargon is an enemy of truth and therefore in direct opposition to the message found in the bible.

Good Quotes

“There are two people who provide the entire world with quotations: Names and Anonymous.”

I wrote that quote.  Is it true, or is it clever?  Does it matter?  It seems to me that most of the quotes that we use come from famous individuals.  Regular people say all kinds of great things throughout their lives, but who cares?  You have to make a name for yourself, or the quote has to be so incredible that people forget your name and you become Mr. Anonymous.  So the next time you see a quote, ask yourself if it’s truly insightful, or if it is something you could have said at a party.

Great Books

I love movies, but more and more I see the advantage of books.  How many times have you heard someone say, “The book was better than the movie”?  In almost all cases the book is more enjoyable than the movie.  The Harry Potter series is perhaps the best modern example.  Is there one person who truly appreciates the books who will then say that the movies are greater?  To claim that the movies are better would undermine the foundation of the series, and prove to everyone that you don’t actually appreciate the story.  Even though Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy is one of the greatest cinematic achievements of all-time, you would be hard pressed to find a fan who didn’t believe wholeheartedly that the books were far greater.  The magic of books is found in the intimacy between author and reader.  The author transports you to a place inside of your own mind where the both of you can go on a fantastic journey.  Isn’t that a beautiful thing?  Let’s value great books.

An Unreasonable Belief in Equality: The Longstanding Tyranny of Religious Influence

The Declaration of Independence has something written in it that sounds a lot like it was tainted by religious ideas.  Here is the section.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.- Declaration of Independence 

I’m not going to use the Founding Fathers to prove to you that this is a Christian nation.   Glenn Beck ruined that argument for all of us. What I want to do here is look at this idea of equality.  What is it based on, and why do we believe in it today?

If I pick apart that snippet of the Declaration it reads like something that you probably wouldn’t find in a modern government document.  That part about a Creator being self-evident stands out to me.  Would our leaders write something so bold and offensive today?  Wouldn’t the network news channels be all over that, showing various negative responses from those who believe in the separation of church and state and who fear that our government officials are being brainwashed by religious beliefs?  Wouldn’t there be a call for reason over religious bias? No?  Yes?  Maybe?

It is self-evident that the Creator (God.  Accidental evolution has nothing to do with creation) made all people equal.   The people created by God are equal.  Alrighty.  What about the people who weren’t created?  Are they equal too?  Let’s explore.

To say that people are equal in relation to God is to recognize a quality of God and not people.  It says more about God to say that we are equal than it does about us.  In this way, we are equal because we are all under God’s authority and God’s law.  We all have the divine spark, the breath of life, the spirit given by God.  Under God we are all in equal need of God for life and purpose.  In relation to God our physical differences take a back seat, and we see ourselves as God sees us… as spiritual beings.  Equality makes sense in relation to God because it is a reasonable consequence of a belief in God.  If God is God, we are equal in our dependence on Him and we share an equal place in the Universe as His creation.  Where I get confused is why the reasonable non-believers believe in equality.

A popular saying among those who don’t believe in any divine creator is, “Show me the proof.”  Very well.  Now let me ask you to show me the proof that we are all equal.  Show me the evidence for equality.  How does your reason lead you to believe in such a faith-based idea?

Will you say that the government told you it was true?  Did the Constitution tell you it is so?  Has society beat it into your brain that all men and women are equal in the eyes of the state?  Did your parents tell you?  Why do you believe in equality when there is so little evidence for it?  Is it because it feels nice to say that we are all brothers and sisters?  Be careful, you’re starting to sound like a believer.

Open your eyes to the world around you.

Physically, people are far from equal.  Some are taller and stronger, and some are weak and sickly.  There are those whose brains don’t work so well, and those who understand calculus without much trouble.  Some don’t seem to be able to lose weight and some can just eat whatever they want and stay skinny.  You’ve got Mr. Muscles and Mr. Skinandbones living side by side believing they are equal.  Yet, clearly we are not equal in the physical realm.

Socially there isn’t much equality either.  You’ve got rich people and poor people.  You’ve got white-collar and blue-collar workers.  Some have millions and some live on the streets.  Certain groups of people experience  regular racial discrimination.  You’ve got the Haves and the Have Nots.  Where’s the proof that we are equal?  Don’t look to society for evidence.

So what are you basing this unfounded belief on?  Are we all equal in some abstract deep sense?   You believe in everyone’s right to happiness and a good life.  I’m no better than you and you are no better than me.  This sounds great, but where is it coming from?  Is it the belief that we are all just animals that came out of the ocean?  Once again, if that’s the case why base your belief on anything more than the  physical reality?  Why do you shun God because you can’t see or touch Him and then accept blindly something as  intangible as perfect equality?

I make this point because I fear weak belief.  A weak belief can be easily altered or tossed out.  If you are basing your belief on something that is abstract and “deep”, or simply taught to you by your government, what happens when the belief is challenged by some hard external pressure, or even the government itself?  When the Nazi’s took control of Germany, they did a great job of convincing the people of inequality.   Were the Jews equal to the Germans at that place and at that time?  Yes? No? Maybe?

Tell me, why?

Side Note:  My friend, Curtis Entenmann has decided to start his own blog in which he intends to respond to my wild conservative Christian ideas.  I will also be responding to him.  We will be posting links to each other’s blogs from time to time so I really think you should check it out.  It should be interesting to see two people with many opposing views reacting and challenging each other.    His blog is just starting out, but very soon he is sure to have many posts.   Here is the link to  Curt’s Blog.  I’m willing to bet he will say something about this last post in a few days.

A Theme Song and a Call For Some Competition

Today I was listening to some music, or to put it as the kids do these days, I was listening to my iPod.  At the same time I was checking over the response to my latest Tiger vs. Gorilla post, and that’s when I got an idea: give the blog a theme song!  Hey, why not?  Wrestlers have theme songs.  Radio talk show hosts have theme songs.  Kars for Kids has a theme song. (pretty sure that’s playing on an endless loop in hell) This blog should have one too.

I chose one song that does a good job of capturing the essence of this blog.  But before I could decide, I had to narrow it down to three.  Here are the first two that I almost chose.

I initially wanted to use a Muse song since they’re my favorite band, and this song touches on many aspects of the blog.  You’ve got a plea to destroy the delusions that wall us in, which is really a desire for the truth.  I’m a fan of truth, and when I write I’m often searching for it or communicating it.  But in the end I couldn’t use it because it was a little too intense.  The tone doesn’t quite capture the lighter side of my blog.  Plus there is a line that goes, “Justify my reasons with your blood.”  That’s the opposite of what I’m trying to do.

Truthfully, this song crossed my mind even though I despise John Mayer.    “Say what you need to say” is simple, but very true.  “Do it with your heart wide open” would have been a nice touch.  But in the end I couldn’t get past my annoyance and I couldn’t choose a song that repeats the same six words over thirty times.

Now to the one that I finally chose to be the official theme song of the blog.

Perfect!

On to the second thing I wanted to talk about.

I was speaking with Nicole about a week ago and we stumbled upon an interesting idea.  What if there was someone who thought the opposite of the way I do, and that person posted a blog?  You know, they hate Cadbury eggs and think Bill Cosby is lame.  They hate God and love John Mayer.  Everything I stand for, they stand against.  And what if that person attracted the same readers?  And what if we responded to each other on a regular basis?   Wouldn’t that be great?  Seriously, that would be fantastic. Nothing motivates like some good competition.

For that reason, I’m calling you out!  Say what you need to say, and show me what your city of delusion is built of.  There’s plenty of room for competing ideas, so let’s make this a full house.

The Tiger/ Gorilla Question: Conclusion

You’re in a maze.  You can’t turn back.  You have only to go forward.  In your hand is a sharp six-inch knife.  Just ahead is a spot where the maze forks in two directions.  If you go one way you must face a tiger (the average size of all tigers) and if you go the other way you must face a gorilla (the average size of all gorillas).  You must kill the animal in order to pass.  Which one do you choose?

I came up with this question a few years back (3 or 4 I believe) and it has not gone away.  Part of the reason for its longevity is the fact that I originally chose the gorilla and most people choose the tiger.  This conflict fuels debate and further interest.  I have always believed that the gorilla is the more reasonable choice.  Yet most think I am foolish.  Well, I now want to put it all to rest by presenting an air-tight argument in favor of the gorilla. To put it another way, I’m going to show the tiger people that they are the foolish ones.

First, let’s look at size.  Here is an illustration of the size comparison between a 6 foot man and a mountain gorilla (which is the largest of the gorillas).

The male mountain gorilla can grow as heavy as 500 pounds and to over 6 feet tall when standing upright.  When you factor the various species of gorilla, you get an average of about 400 pounds and a size of about 5 feet standing upright. That’s still nothing to shake a stick at.  But how does the tiger compare?

On the left is the size comparison between a man and a lion, so ignore that.  The middle image is of a Bengal tiger and the image on the right is of the largest tiger, the Amur.  From what I’ve gathered, to average the tiger sizes you would have a length of about 8.5 feet and a weight of about 450 pounds.  (I used two internet sources and neither were wikipedia).  You could say that they are of comparable size to the gorilla, if not larger.

The main point I am trying to make with the reality of size is that gorillas are not significantly larger than tigers.  If anything, tigers are larger.   I believe that many people envision gorillas to be larger than they actually are and tigers to be smaller.

Now that I’ve shown you that tigers are a little bigger than gorillas, let’s move to my next point, which is what these animals are designed for.

Tigers are predators.  Gorillas eat plants.

Tigers have claws that can extend to 4 inches.  They have canines that often exceed three inches.  Tigers have powerful jaw muscles to “clamp on prey with crushing force.”  They are built to take down animals and kill them.  Here is a quote I found.

Corbett’s idiosynchratic Temple tiger, after fighting over a kill with a very large black bear, then picked up the cow, weighing six or seven hundred pounds, and dragged it for some two miles up a densely wooded hill, negotiating dense undergrowths, fallen trees and great masses of rock

Now let’s look at the vegetarian gorilla.

Gorillas are herbivores that eat seeds and fruits and sometimes ants and termites.   They are certainly strong at about six times stronger than an adult male.  But that strength is not used to hunt prey.  They have fairly large canines, but most of their teeth are flat for chomping on plants.  They are not killing machines.

Conclusion:  Tigers are killing machines that are at least of comparable size to gorillas.  Tigers are built to kill large prey.  Gorillas are built to pick plants.  Tigers have impressive strength, at the very least on par with gorillas.  Gorillas are about six times stronger than an adult man.

People choose tiger due to misconceptions in size and ferocity.  They saw The Neverending Story when they were kids and they think that the tiger will simply jump at them and all that needs to be done is stab them once in the neck.  You know it’s true!

King Kong and Mighty Joe Young don’t help either.

Gorilla is the correct answer.

Case closed.

The Magic of Yogurtland: The Indecisive Sweet Lover’s Paradise

Gather round and I will tell you a tale of a far away place filled with beauty and defined by perfect freedom.  It is a sacred country where lions and gorillas play peacefully with puppies and baby monkeys.  A land flowing with milk and honey, where the old teach wisdom to the young and the young sing songs of innocence and promise.   Yes, this is a frozen treat lover’s paradise.  This is a sanctuary of unapologetic indulgence.  My friends, this is Yogurtland.

The slogan of Yogurtland really captures its essence: You Rule.  From the moment you walk in, you are in control of your experience.  And, oh, how simple a concept this is.  You pick a dish, you choose your flavors, and you choose your toppings.  But you don’t just choose and surrender to some frozen yogurt jockey, you add everything in any amount or order your heart desires.   Then, when it’s all over, they simply weigh your dish and charge you accordingly.  But don’t fret about the cost, even with my gut-busting mountain of chilly goodness it still cost under five dollars.

Now let me tell you about the flavors.  They have Red Velvet Cupcake Batter, Nutter Butter, Strawberry Cheesecake, Chocolate Milkshake, Double Cookies and Cream, Green Tea, Pistachio, Dragon Passion Tart, Dutch Chocolate and more!  This is premium stuff, and even without the toppings would make Yogurtland a special place.  But who are we kidding?  On to the toppings.

For the health inclined they have fruits and stuff.  Ok, ok they have a great selection of fruits and nuts and pretty much any healthy thing you could imagine to place on top of frozen yogurt.  I sort of looked past those toppings, though.  You’ll understand why in a second.

Crushed Oreo cookies, Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups, M&M’s, mini Nutter Butters, brownie chunks, cheesecake bits, Kit Kat pieces, sprinkles, crushed graham crackers, at least four kinds of sauces, chocolate chips, Gummi Bears, mini caramel cups and many many more.  As I mentioned in the title, it’s an indecisive sweet lover’s paradise.  Just get a little of everything.  I did.

This is all well and good, and I hope I have peaked your interest, but unfortunately I have some sobering news for my fellow New Englanders.  My experience took place in California, and  the closest Yogurtland to us is in New Jersey.  It’s a long way to travel for a treat.  Then again, maybe it’s worth it.  After all, we can’t let Bruce Springsteen and Snooki have their fill without taking some for ourselves.

And maybe, just maybe someone out there is looking to open a franchise here in my home state of Massachusetts.  Perhaps it’s you.  If that’s the case, let me assure you that I speak for my millions of hungry brothers and sisters here in New England when I say, “Make this California dream a Massachusetts reality!

UPDATE 1/9/13:  Yogurtland announced it is coming to Boston!  Click here to learn more.

The Evils of Social Justice

Do you remember when Glenn Beck said, “I beg you, look for the words ‘social justice‘ or ‘economic justice’ on your church Web site. If you find it, run as fast as you can. Social justice and economic justice, they are code words. Now, am I advising people to leave their church? Yes!…Communists are on the left, and the Nazis are on the right. That’s what people say. But they both subscribe to one philosophy, and they flew one banner. . . . But on each banner, read the words, here in America: ‘social justice.’ They talked about economic justice, rights of the workers, redistribution of wealth, and surprisingly, democracy.”

I remember there was a big response from all sides on this controversial quote.  Many Christian churches condemned Beck’s words.  But not every Christian church stood opposed.  And I believe many Christians in America today agree with what Beck had to say.

Recently I attended a church, and I won’t say which, where the pastor stated that social justice is in opposition to Christianity.  Now, before I go further I should state what social justice is.  Social justice is any effort to make all people of equal standing.  So if one group is oppressed, social justice would work to end their oppression.  Another definition I found is the fair distribution of advantages, assets, and benefits among all members of a society.   I think that definition is important because it sends off red flags in the minds of certain people.

To some, social justice means socialism.  And I believe that is the problem people have with the word and its implications.  But, as usual, things aren’t this simple.  Let me try to explain all of this the best that I can.

From the conservative standpoint, socialism is a false ideology that stifles individual growth and creativity.  It promotes a welfare state in which the upper and middle working classes have to support the millions who either can’t work or refuse to.  It also goes hand in hand with government control over our lives since individuals are less responsible for their own well-being and more dependent on the system.  And with that comes a threat to independent thought and individual freedom.  So when they smell even a hint of this ideology (as we saw with Obamacare), they freak out.  I think a strong reaction against it makes a lot of sense when you hold to this viewpoint.  If you think conservatives are mindless rage-aholics, maybe you should try to see things from their perspective.

Anyways, what I see happening in some churches and with some Christians is this negative association between social justice and socialism where the former is an indication of the latter.  And where this comes into conflict with the Christian message I believe occurs on a number of levels.  Some are obvious and some are subtle.

The conservative mind makes a connection between socialism and a liberal agenda.  One of the most repeated and damning accusations of Obama is that he’s a socialist.  There is certainly some credence to this connection between liberals and socialism.  Liberals tend to be most outspoken on issues of social justice (gay marriage, women’s right, immigrant’s rights) and also more inclined to take from the wealthy to give to the poor (spreading the wealth) through taxation.  Now, the connection I make to this conflicting with the Christian message comes directly from this liberal/socialist association.  Liberals tend to fall on the wrong side of many issues of morality in the eyes of conservative Christians.  Issues like abortion and gay marriage are perhaps the most publicized.  This negative association of liberals with immorality, or beliefs that are wrong,  helps to feed hatred and fear for all of the things they stand for, including social justice.  Basically, there is guilt by association.  To many conservative Christians liberals are ungodly.  Now I’ll expand on that.

There are pretty much two ways of viewing the world, human-centric and God-centric.  Those who do not believe, or simply do not care for God will tend to elevate the place of humans in the world.  They will make mankind the center of everything.   Those who believe God is the center of this life will base their value of human life according to what the bible teaches.  The bible teaches that humans are evil, and only by the grace of God can they live according to the truth and accomplish truly good works for their fellow man.  The God-centric people, if they actually follow the God of the bible will be able to love other people more freely.  The human-centric people must believe in the goodness of people since people are what they have put their hope in.  Humanists believe that people need to be educated and afforded good opportunities in order to reach their full potential.  Many liberals (not all) are humanists who believe that the answer to the world’s evils are more education and greater wealth for the impoverished.  Afforded the opportunity, people will choose good over evil.  Education, or greater enlightenment is the answer.  More knowledge and greater technology will save mankind.  This is why the message of social justice is so crucial for these people.  If we make a way for people to live well, they will thrive and choose goodness.

The problem that many conservative Christians have with this is that it is propelled from a false philosophy removed of God.  And more than that, they believe it is false to believe in the inherent goodness of people.  They believe that the answer to the world’s problems is personal salvation through Jesus Christ.  Only when one individual after another is transformed by the life of God will real good change occur in the world.

So, to summarize, the problem many conservative Christians have with social justice is that it is often fueled by a human-centric worldview associated with socialism and an immoral liberal agenda.

But that’s not the end.  Social justice should be embraced by the Christian church.  Jesus taught us to minister to the poor and the oppressed.  The bible commands us to “Defend the cause of the fatherless, plead the case of the widow (Isaiah 1:17).  If anything, Christians should be at the front lines of social justice, and not making damning judgments of those who hold to opposing philosophies.

Ok, that’s the end.

(Afterthought:  I should have been more clear in my conclusion about what I see as the role of the Christian church.  I believe Christians should be at the front of social justice as it pertains to the welfare of other people.  Historically, Christians were the ones founding hospitals and caring for the sick and needy.  This type of humanitarian effort should be a major focus of the church.  But, when it pertains to the advancement of social agendas that stand opposed to the Christian’s beliefs about mankind and God, Christians should not be compromising their beliefs in the name of social justice.  This wouldn’t make any sense as the Christian would see it as inevitably harming their fellow man and supporting such an agenda would not be the loving thing to do, nor the right thing.  I should have done a better job at differentiating between social justice in the political sphere and social justice in the humanitarian sphere.) 

The Battle for the Modern Mind

What a title, huh.  I hope I can live up to it.

There are a lot of isms out there, and none of them should be taken lightly.  You’ve got relativism, hedonism, legalism, pluralism, patriotism, nationalism, socialism, capitalism, liberalism, conservatism, atheism, theism, agnosticism, humanism etc etc etc into eternity.   All of these and the many that I haven’t mentioned represent particular philosophies on life that affect the human condition.  Basically, they work to shape and define our world.  We live and die by them.  They matter.

Very good.

Moving on.

How important are ideas to the human race?  I think they are more important than you or I think.  Wars are fought to preserve them.  Peace is one of them.  Hitler had some.  Gandhi had some of his own.  Darwin, Einstein, and Martin Luther King Jr. had a few as well.  Ideas change the world because they change people’s minds.  They are invaluable.  A good idea is worth more than a glass of water in the ninth circle of hell.  You get the idea.

You see, there is a battle raging constantly, and I’m calling it the Battle for the Modern Mind.  It is a war of thoughts, philosophies, beliefs, and opinions.  The weapon is media and the chief ammunition is language.  If I’m sounding like a crazy conspiracy theorist I guess there’s no way around it.  But I’m not reaching with this observation.  I believe most people will agree with me.  In fact, many people will think I’m stating the obvious.  I’m digressing.

I write this in order to address the overarching struggle that we face in our modern interconnected world.  It is a struggle to discern what is true among so many competing ideas.  We are bombarded with ideas like a house cat caught in a hail storm.

Nothing is certain.

Death is certain.

There is an afterlife.

Conservatives are racists.

Liberals are socialists.

God is good.

God doesn’t exist.

We were created.

We spawned from nothing.

The universe is expanding.

Cell phones cause cancer.

Cell phones are safe.

Obama is great.

Obama sucks.

People are equal.

Your pleasure is important.

The needs of others is important.

Truth is relative.

Christians are stupid.

Muslims want to kill everyone.

Keanu Reeves is a good actor.

Social justice is important.

Catholic priests molest boys.

Abortion is about choice.

Abortion is murder.

Gay marriage is an abomination.

Gay marriage is none of your business.

Our minds are pelted over and over and over and over again and again and again every single day with ideas that often challenge our core beliefs, and leave us confused and aggravated.  What is right?  What path do I take?  How will I define myself in a world where everyone and no one is correct?

I don’t want to be a soldier in this fight.  I don’t want to try and capture your mind to my side.  You get enough of that from everywhere else.  Besides, it’s your mind and I have no right to reside there.  All I want to do is make you aware of the forces that seek to influence you.  I want to encourage you to think for yourself and really ask some hard questions about your purpose in this life.  Know where you stand, and what you stand for.  It’s hard to stay true to yourself even when you have a firm hold on your identity, but it’s impossible to be your own person when you don’t know who you are.

The world is all too eager to define you with its own ideas.

Know thyself.

The battle rages.

The Purpose of My Blog

I’m a creature of purpose.  If I believe an action serves no purpose, it is extremely difficult for me to complete it.  Forcing myself to read a Calculus textbook comes to mind.  This blog has a purpose.  I want to write about it now.

First and foremost, this blog exists as a means for me to write.  To put it another way, I write to write.  I like to write, so I write.  I need to write in order to sustain and inevitably improve my abilities.  Since this is my main purpose, I can cover a wide range of subjects that span from the meaning of life to Lady Gaga.  If this was not my focus, it would not make sense for me to jump around from serious topics to silly ones and then back again.

Second, (or is it secondly? Who am I talking to?)  this blog exists to give a coherent voice to the Christian community of which I am a member of.  I have long felt that my people are misunderstood and misrepresented in our culture.  I also recognize that a good many prominent Christian leaders (both preachers and politicians)  misrepresent the Christian way.  The image that many have of an American Christian is not pretty, so I desire to clean it up by writing plainly, truthfully, and transparently.

Third(liest), I intend to evaluate the culture in which we live.  Movies, music, and current events all fall into this portion of purpose.  We are all influenced by the world around us, and I want to address areas that I believe impact our humanity.

Fourth(iest), I want to provoke a response from you.  I want you to respond to what I write.  I want to hear from you.  I want to know that I’m not sending myself letters in the mail.  Write back.

Fifth(fully), lastly, but not leastly, I aim to entertain.  Hopefully this happens in every post.  Tastefully in the more serious posts.  I want to have a good time writing, and I want you to have a good time reading.  It will keep this whole thing going.

The purpose of this post on purpose was to remind myself and educate you as to why we are here, writing and reading this blog.  If you have any comments, please send them my way.  I love to hear from anyone who takes the time to pick up anything that I put down.