Category Archives: Popular Culture
When do you ever hear something positive about McDonald’s?
My betrothed will not take kindly to what I’m about to say. She’s about the most outspoken person I’ve ever met in opposition to fast food. That being said, I hope she and the rest of you can see through to the point I will attempt to make in the following post: McDonald’s should be admired for its excellence.
Fat people sued them because they were looking for a delicious scapegoat for their reckless gluttony. Morgan Spurlock demonized them in his documentary, Super Size Me, in which he ate nothing but McDonald’s food for a month. He suffered physically for this feat, but I wonder why he didn’t just pour salt down his throat and marvel at how dehydrated he got. Ronald McDonald, the clown who serves as the face of their kid-focused charitable endeavors, is often targeted by comedians for being creepy. McDonald’s has also been forced into posting all of their nutrition facts. This seems unfair since you can easily consume a couple thousand calories at most chain restaurants. Lately, there has been a push in some communities against the Happy Meal, since it “lures” kids into eating unhealthy food. You know, because kids are the ones who drive themselves to McDonald’s and pay for everything. It really seems like McDonald’s is being singled out. But why?
They are the #1 fast food chain in the world. They serve nearly 70 million people a day in about 120 countries. They employ 400,000 people and earned over 20 billion in revenue in 2010. McDonald’s has become a symbol of globalization, spreading their brand throughout the civilized world. In short, they are the best at what they do.
McDonald’s has achieved a level of excellence which should be praised. Yes, for their ability to succeed in a global marketplace, and to evolve with the times, McDonald’s should be commended.
I am not saying everyone should eat McDonald’s all of the time. That makes you fat and unhealthy much like eating out most other places would. What I’m saying is that they are the global leader in their area of the marketplace for a reason. They are easy to target for their contribution to American obesity, but when it comes down to it these same people who point a greasy finger at them are the reason McDonald’s is the powerhouse that it is. If we didn’t like it, McDonald’s wouldn’t exist.
So let’s just admit to ourselves that McDonald’s is the best at what they do. And let’s also accept responsibility for what we put into our bodies without acting like helpless victims at the mercy of such a delicious juggernaut.
Subtext-a message which is not stated directly but can be inferred.
Homeward Bound is one of those rare childhood films that can mean more to you as an adult. I would place Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory in the same category, and I explain why in the posts, Willy Wonka is a Fine Wine and Finding God in Film. These films touch upon universal themes that children either overlook or fail to appreciate because there is much about life they have yet to experience. In the case of Homeward Bound, it took many repeat viewings and a good amount of growing up for me to grasp the powerful subtext at its core. From beginning to end this story is about fatherhood.
The film opens with the character of Chance, a young “pup” of a dog, delivering a brief monologue about his past. He says, “I was abandoned when I was very young. I lived on the streets scranging for food, sleeping wherever I could; that seemed like fun at first, but pretty soon, it landed me behind bars.” We learn that he was separated from his parents, and likely also separated from his first owners. Like a child whose father walked out, Chance feels the sting of abandonment.
The human children in the film, Peter, Hope and Jamie, are faced with the difficulty of accepting a new man in the role of father. In the beginning of the film we witness a wedding between their mother and her new husband, Bob. The children, especially Peter, are noticeably troubled. There is a touching moment immediately after the couple finishes saying their vows where Peter looks down at Shadow and pats him. It makes me wonder, what happened to Peter’s father? Did he walk out on the family, or did he die? It’s likely that Shadow was either Peter’s father’s dog, or given to Peter by his father. Regardless, we can assume that Shadow is deeply connected to Peter and his lost father. And in many ways Shadow fills the role of father for both Peter and Chance.
Without question, Shadow is the heart and soul of Homeward Bound. He is loyal, faithful, and wise. He is the leader and protector of Chance and the cat, Sassy. At the start of the film we see that Shadow views Chance much like an old man views the younger generation. He says, “I’d sure like to give that dog a talking to,” when Chance misbehaves at the wedding. Then he continues by asking Chance the rhetorical question, “Would a rolled up newspaper mean anything to you?” Shadow understands that Chance needs guidance and discipline. He has a lot to learn, since he has grown up without a fatherly example.
Later in the film, after the animals have spent many days journeying through the woods in an attempt to return home, Sassy gets caught in a river and tumbles over a waterfall. Once Shadow and Chance determine that she must be dead, we see the first moment in which Chance recognizes that Shadow is worthy of his respect. Here is the exchange.
Shadow: [after Sassy is lost in the river] I shouldn’t have made her come.
Chance: It’s not your fault, she wanted to come.
Shadow: But it’s my responsibility. I had a responsibility to Sassy – to love her and protect her – the same as I have to you… and to Peter. And the same as you have to Jamie.
Chance: But we didn’t ask for this job.
Shadow: We didn’t have to. It’s built in. Has been ever since the dawn of time… when a few wild dogs took it upon themselves to watch over man, to bark when he’s in danger, to run and play with him when he’s happy, to nuzzle him when he’s lonely. That’s why they call us man’s best friend.
Chance: [narrating] Looking at him that night, he seemed so wise… and ancient, like the first dog who ever walked the earth. I just hope that one day, I can be like him.
The exchange could easily be applied to fatherhood. Shadow speaks of having a responsibility to love and protect those who depend on him. And when Chance challenges this obligation by saying, “But we didn’t ask for this job,” Shadow responds that it is built-in. It is a deep and undeniable truth of life. Many fathers don’t ask to be fathers. Many fathers don’t accept the responsibility to love and protect their children. Chance is just beginning to understand.
Near the end of the film, Shadow falls into a hole and it appears that he may never get out. Watch from minute 1 to minute 4. After, I will explain how this is the moment that Chance fully accepts fatherhood, and Shadow answers the problem of abandonment, which permeates the entire film.
“I won’t let you give up,” Chance promises Shadow. He has become the loving protector. He gets down in the mud with Shadow to give him the strength to move forward. Chance also finally acknowledges that he loves Shadow and wants him by his side. This shows a profound devotion, much like the kind a father experiences with his son. But at the same time Shadow believes that his life is nearing its end. He states, “I have nothing left to give.” Despite Chance’s sincere efforts to encourage him, Shadow takes this desperate occasion to teach Chance a “final” lesson. He says, “You’ve learned everything you need, Chance. Now all you have to learn is how to say goodbye.” Every father must leave his son someday, and even if he was entirely loving and wise and loyal the son must learn to be on his own. He must make peace with the absence of his father.
If you continue to watch that clip you will see the children playing basketball with Bob. They are very happy, and we witness a touching moment in which Peter and Hope call their new father, dad. It tells us that the children, especially Peter, have accepted him. This means that they have learned to make peace with the father that is lost. It also indicates that they have made peace with the likelihood that their animals will never return. They have matured by learning how to say goodbye. And a major part of saying goodbye is the ability to say hello to what is in front of you.
The return of the animals at the end is deeply moving. It is also profound. After Sassy and Chance return, Peter becomes sad as he embraces the likelihood that Shadow was unable to make it.
“It was too far. He was just too old,” Peter tells himself.
The gulf between the living and the dead appears too far for us to ever be reunited. How could we ever hope to see them again?
I can’t help but think about God at this moment. I think about the promise of new life. All that is written about God being our loving Father, our protector. How often are we like Peter, losing hope? It’s too far. He is too old. It’s just an old story.
My Father isn’t about to rise over that hill.
Homeward Bound is about fatherhood, and healing from the pain of abandonment when fathers leave. The entire film is an expression of a father’s devotion to be reunited with his son.
It is about boundless love.
For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans 8:38-39)
I’ve seen many movies. I’ve seen too many movies. It is impossible for me to justify how much time I’ve spent watching them. It has been said that it takes 10,000 hours of practice to become a master at something. Well, I don’t think I’m quite there but I’m close enough to claim some authority on the subject of film. For today’s purpose I will write on the subject of judging the quality of a movie: a topic I have pondered much.
Do you believe movies, or any form of art, can be judged objectively? Can two people with entirely different tastes watch the same film and agree upon the value of its content and structure? Or are they entirely at the mercy of their individual interpretations, feelings, and opinions? Could it be both?
When I watch a movie many things occur inside of my head. I become a part of the viewing experience and allow myself to be subject to the unfolding drama. Perhaps I am deeply moved, or maybe I am irritated. One or more characters might resonate with me, and I feel connected. Inversely, I may not feel any connection to either the story or the characters. The movie does nothing to reach me, and I walk away unaffected. All of these reactions have to do with my personal experience with the film. This is one of two ways that we can judge a movie, and this is likely the way that most people judge them.
The second type of judgement is more detached and objective. Objectivity is best exemplified, in my opinion, in math. 2+2=4 no matter what any crackpot philosopher says. When you plug a concrete value into a concrete equation you get a concrete result. If I challenged the answer of 4 in the equation of 2+2 I would be either a fool, an intelligent fool, or a brilliant fool. No quantity of words and abstract explanations could change the answer. It is accepted as truth. So can a film be objectively good, even if I don’t particularly enjoy it?
An artist is an intentional and purposeful being. Even those artists who say they are making something strange and undefinable operate due to some knowable motivation. Consider the Terrence Malick film, Tree of Life. I have heard that even he doesn’t have the words or knowledge to describe what it all means. And one could argue that any good piece of art can’t be easily defined. Even so, he understood that to make a movie he needed a plot and some characters. He needed a setting and some themes. It is clear in watching that grace and truth are themes, as well as life and death. The conclusions of the film are abstract, but it doesn’t take away from the necessary and concrete pieces that all stories must contain. You must have character, plot, setting, theme, and a structure that serves them all. Tree of Life was nominated for best picture because it can be judged along the same lines as The Artist. They are very different in content and effect, but the academy understood that both were masterfully constructed by artists who understand the core makeup of a good film. Movies must follow the rules of good storytelling, and for that reason they can be judged objectively.
Think of a house. It has been designed by a master architect. The woodwork has been crafted by a master carpenter. The plumbing has been installed by a master plumber. This house is designed to stand and function properly. It serves the purpose of a house. No one intentionally builds a house to have leaky pipes. Now, you might love this house. You think the layout suits your tastes and needs. The color scheme is fantastic. The tiled bathroom seems to call out your name. Then again, you might not like this house at all. It’s too big, or too small. Maybe you don’t like the neighbors. The house is well-built, but it just doesn’t feel right for you. It is the same with a movie. It could be well put together, following the crucial building blocks of a good story, but you don’t find yourself captivated by it. You don’t want to spend much time living inside of it because it doesn’t speak to you. Of course another scenario might be that the movie isn’t well put together, like a house that’s falling apart, but you find some special charm about it that makes you want to stay a while. A movie can be objectively bad, but subjectively satisfying. Face/Off and Independence Day come to mind for me.
I hope this has cleared things up for you. This is how I judge movies; on two levels. I think it allows for much freedom, to like a bad film and to dislike a good one. It also distinguishes between the realms of the heart and the mind without putting up a wall between them. So whether a movie touches your heart, your mind, or both, take some time to admire the fine craftsmanship.
Is our country a Christian nation?
The first thing we need to explore is what it means to be Christian. If you were looking at the true definition of Christian you would find that it can only apply to a human being. Christians are followers of Jesus Christ who accept his identity as God, savior, and master of their lives. Jesus told his followers, “If you love me, you will obey what I command.”(John 14:15) Christians love Jesus and live a life that expresses love toward him. They still sin and fail regularly at imitating him, but at their core they are devoted to the struggle of seeking God in a fallen world. True Christians are living and active, so this means that CDs and books and movies cannot truly be Christian. They don’t have the life of God in them. In the same way a country cannot be truly Christian. Even if 100% of the citizenry were Christians, and all of the government’s policies were informed by Christian principles, what we would have is a very large Christian community composed of individual believers. The United States would not be Christian; its people would be Christian.
Now, all of that being said I know that when people call an object “Christian” they don’t believe that it is saved by Jesus. They likely mean that it has a message which somehow ties into God. Switchfoot is a Christian band. Their music is shaped by their beliefs and many call it Christian. In its own way it points to Christ, so I will say that when anything outside of a human being is labeled “Christian” it must in some way point to Jesus Christ.
The two working definitions of Christian that I will use for the rest of this post are:
- A human being who accepts Jesus Christ as their personal savior, which results in an inner transformation turning the individual, over a lifetime, into the likeness of Jesus Christ. This means their thoughts and actions will be increasingly like those of Jesus as they seek to know him. More than a title or affiliation or even religion, Christianity is giving all of yourself with the belief that God will give you his own life in return.
- Anything that is not a human that points to Jesus Christ as he is portrayed in the gospels. Examples are music, paintings, movies, books, culture, etc.
Is our country a Christian nation?
I have heard arguments from both sides regarding the Christian foundations of America. One side claims that the founding members of this country were largely Christian, or at least heavily informed by Christian principles. As a result they drafted our core documents with divine assistance from God and turned to Him in prayer before taking critical first steps as a nation. The other side points out that many of them were Deists (namely Thomas Jefferson who made his own Bible by taking out all that mystical stuff about miracles and resurrections) or simply non-religious like the Enlightenment hero, Benjamin Franklin. This side also is keen on emphasizing the separation of church and state, which they say is the intention of our founders. Taken even further, this separation is used as proof that the founders wanted religion far removed from the governing bodies of this land. So what’s the deal?
Based on what I’ve gathered, and trying really hard not to let my own bias taint my senses, I believe that Christianity did play a critical role in the formation of this country. But at the same time ideas shaped by the Enlightenment were used to craft our government structures. The Bible was not the central document through which the Constitution was formed. That being said, many of the men who had a hand in the beginning were devout Christians, so it is not correct to assume that they wanted Christians to be separated from government entirely. Their ideal government wouldn’t be one in which men didn’t allow their faith to play a role in their decisions. Religion would never be forced on anyone, but America would also not force the religious to deny their convictions once in public office. If you need some proof of someone in high office exercising their faith, just look to George Washington or Abraham Lincoln. American citizens elect these people to reflect their own values.
More important than where we were yesterday as a nation is where we are today. Does our culture look Christian? Do our policies look Christian? Are our people even Christian?
Certainly, the dominant culture in this country is far from reflecting Christian values. The American Dream at its core is about amassing worldly wealth and happiness so that you can have a comfortable life. Is this anything like what Christ meant when he said to his followers, ” If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me.”? (Matthew 16:24) The values that we see on television are shallow and ungodly. Physical beauty and the vitality of youth is idolized and sex is used as a tool for profit. How many advertisers and television shows whore themselves in our living rooms? The internet spills over with porn with millions of men and women captivated by the dull lustful glow of their computer screens. This isn’t about gay marriage and abortion, though legalized abortion is perhaps the greatest noose around the neck of America’s spirit. This is about a culture of death. We live in a culture of death. In one moment we are thrilled by distant or digital violence and in the next promised that eternal beauty and health is attainable. Just buy this or watch this or read this. So much of our culture is based on avoiding the reality of our inevitable deaths. This is the opposite of the Christian life. Clearly we cannot call our culture “Christian” since it does little to point anyone to Jesus Christ.
But what about our people?
How many people who say they are Christians are truly followers of Christ? Say 70% of the country identified themselves as Christian. Of those, how many go to church maybe once or twice a year and live their lives as if they didn’t love Jesus? A conservative guess would be half. Just consider all of the people you know who call themselves Christian or Catholic. Of those, how many would you actually label as a legitimate follower of Jesus Christ? How many actually live as if God was the love of their life? I even recognize that I am in danger of falling into this category when I consider how little I resemble Jesus and how much I embody the culture in which I live.
The point I’m trying to make is that Christians, true believers who live for God, are not the majority in this country. Christians are in the minority. Many conservatives hold tightly to their traditional “Christian” values but their lives are far from the heart of God.
Most Americans are not Christian.
Is America a Christian nation? No. We were once much more united by Christian values, but we are currently far removed from that past. Our culture is not Christian. Our people are not Christian. And increasingly less so.
God moves in the hearts of people. What will become of ours?
If you know me, you know this story.
In 2006 Cadbury eggs shrunk in America from 39g to 34g. At that time Cadbury of America hid behind the slogan, “They haven’t gotten smaller, you’ve gotten bigger.” Of course this was just a ploy and the lid was eventually blown off on the Conan O’Brien show when B.J. Novak (Ryan from The Office) held up the 2005 egg next to the 2006 version. The difference in size was obvious. Fortunately, the egg remained the same size in all other countries so any true connoisseur could obtain them with just a little extra effort. Then in 2008 Canada shrunk their egg to match the American version, and by 2010 only England, the home of Cadbury, held true to the 39g classic. In just a few short years only one bastion remains. England is the final stronghold.
A bit of detective work, some would call an obsessive crusade, has revealed to me that Hershey is the true culprit in this crime against humanity. They are the ones who distribute Cadbury products in America, and they were the first to experiment with the reduction. I have to believe that when most people didn’t even notice the difference, or when they did notice didn’t care enough to boycott, the power players around the world saw an opportunity to save buckets of money. If people are going to spend the same amount for less egg it only makes sense to produce more of the smaller eggs. I can’t say I blame them, but I can’t say I don’t despise them deeply.
So what are the implications of this Hershey/Cadbury (Now Kraft owns Cadbury so they are included as well) power play? What happens when a people grow apathetic to the growing influence of their governments and corporations? Liberty is traded for ignorance. Freedom is traded for a false sense of security. The powerful become stronger while those subjected to them become weaker.
We’ve settled, people. We’ve settled for a smaller Cadbury egg. When Netflix went crazy with arrogance and decided to raise prices and make their service less convenient by breaking it into two entities, people jumped ship by the hundreds of thousands. This forced Netflix to keep their prices low and ditch that lame “Flixster” idea. When Bank of America said they were going to start charging a $5 debit card fee, people revolted and forced the banking giant to drop that scheme. The American people have the power to change policies. We are the ones who give these corporations power. We are to blame for the 34g Cadbury egg.
As long as the same nerds who hate George Lucas keep giving him money, George will keep ruining Star Wars. As long as people keep seeing bad 3D movies, Hollywood will keep making them. As long as we keep watching the new terrible episodes of The Simpsons, they will keep animating them and ruining their once great legacy. As long as we keep eating these false 34g Cadbury eggs, they will keep feeding them to us.
This Easter season, don’t settle for less. Purchase your eggs from England and take a stand against tyranny. Another American Revolution is coming, but this time our freedom comes from the British.
You know you’ve made it when people start believing that you might be the Antichrist. Basically every modern president, and a good number of world leaders ranging from Hitler to the Pope have been given that title by some group of people searching for a sign of the end. A few years back someone told me, in all seriousness, that Obama was the Antichrist and Oprah was his false prophet. Now, that sounds pretty ridiculous, but let’s for a moment consider what qualities one must possess to be a worthy contender for the title. The Bible contains a number of verses that describe this “man of lawlessness” or “son of perdition” who “exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God”. (2 Thessalonians 2:4) Basically he will be a powerful figure with incredible influence over the people of the world who will attempt to take the place of God. Look at this verse…
“And he spoke terrible words of blasphemy against God, slandering his name and his dwelling—that is, those who dwell in heaven. And the beast was allowed to wage war against God’s holy people and to conquer them. And he was given authority to rule over every tribe and people and language and nation. And all the people who belong to this world worshiped the beast.” (Revelation 13)
Wow, that is a lot of power and influence! Who or what could possibly possess these striking and blasphemous qualities? I submit, after much consideration and a few Google searches, that Google is a legitimate contender.
Let’s start right at the Google search engine. If you type in “Google is” you get the following suggestions: Google Israel, Google is God, Google is, and Google is evil. Israel is significant as it is the home of God’s chosen people, the Jews. It contains the city of Jerusalem, which was the site of the Temple. The Jewish people built this temple thousands of years ago, and it contained something called the Holy of Holies, which was a sacred place in which God resided. This temple was destroyed long ago, but many believe that it will soon be rebuilt. Anyway, it is significant that Google Israel is the first thing to pop up considering the following verse, “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel–let the reader understand.” (Matthew 24:15) In one sense, it is not hard to envision a rebuilt temple with a computer inside of it containing the internet, and as a result Google. But in another sense you can see how Google is already standing in the holy place since this is the first suggestion to pop up, and Google is in close proximity to Israel. Let the reader understand. Google is God doesn’t require much explanation. The verses I’ve already written for you contain much about the Antichrist attempting to seize God’s place in the world. God is meant to be the focal point for those who believe, and as an idol which steals our attention from the Almighty, Google takes His place. Google is might need some clarification. In the Bible God refers to Himself at various points as I AM. Jesus also does this. I AM is a way of stating absolute being. Google is strikes me as similar to I AM since it is a simple statement of being. Once again, Google attempts to supersede God. Google is evil looks like a warning to me. The Antichrist will be evil underneath all of his attempts to appear like God, just as this fourth suggestion appears underneath the others.
I also want you to consider the nature of the Google search engine. What do we use it for? Have you ever heard someone say, “What did we do before Google?” We use it as a means to find the answers. Do you have a strange rash? Type it into Google and find some answers. Want to know what Christians or Muslims believe? Just search for it in Google. Want to know anything and everything? All you have to do is sit down at your computer and search. Google is the number one search engine, and as such guides millions and millions of people every day to the information that Google deems appropriate for them to see based on their terms. Who do we turn to for the answers? Who has authority to guide us? What influence.
Google is available all over the world and in almost every language. Remember the verse from earlier, which states that the Antichrist has “authority to rule over every tribe and people and language and nation”.
Google is also a portal to all of the evil that can be found online. This is the darkness underneath the false appearance that we find so appealing. It tempts millions to sin.
As a corporation, Google’s informal slogan was “Don’t be evil.” Does that strike anyone as a little suspicious?
Google basically owns the Internet. Here is a line from an article I found at the top of my Google search:
Google decides what information is going to be seen in front of all else. People go to Google.com first, so ultimately because of its loyal following, Google has been given by many the authority to decide what gets seen on the internet and what doesn’t.
Along with this authority, Google also owns YouTube, which is the window to the world for many. Google has the whole world in its hands with Google Earth and maps out our lives with Google Maps.
In many ways, Google is the Internet. The source of billions of pages of information containing our histories, religions, politics, hopes, dreams, fears, and destinies. Such power. Such influence. Such a capacity for evil.
Watch this video.
A Note: Verses from the Bible can be stripped out of context and used to promote a variety of ungodly ideologies. Satan himself does this in the Bible. (Matthew 4) The Bible is meant to be read as a way to connect with God, or to understand Him better. I wrote this partially to entertain and partially to draw attention to how influential Google is in our lives. I’m not truly a believer that Google is the Antichrist, but I am a believer that Google is a powerful entity with the power to shape our thoughts through the spreading of information. We must be aware of the influence of technology, and especially the internet, in all of our lives whether or not we believe in God. But to the Christians I would say not to scoff at the idea of Google as an antichrist since it can serve as a wide gateway to a whole world of sin.
By Nate King
Over the holidays most sit down to a prescribed dose of traditional Christmas movie cheer. I, like anyone, have my own list of films that usually wind up getting watched every season. Classics like A Christmas Story, It’s a Wonderful Life, Home Alone, National Lampoon’s Christmas Family Vacation and Elf (Yeah it’s a classic, don’t fight me on this) are watched without fail at least once every November/December.
However I’ve discovered another list of films, films that don’t seem to be recognized quite so often under the average persons category of “Christmas movie”, yet ones which also find their way into my home the same time every year. This is a list of all those movies, and believe it or not they are all Christmas movies.
1. Die Hard 1 and 2
It’s reasonable to assume this list owes it’s entire existence to these first two films. I only noticed this unconventional Christmas habit after discovering just how often Die Hard had been watched in my home each season. It’s also the first out-of-the-ordinary Christmas film I remember watching and it would be foolish to think it hasn’t lead to others. See, my mom apparently has a thing for manly men solving the worlds problems with guns, which must have made John McClane a particular attraction of hers, because every year without fail me and my mom have wound up in front of the TV watching Die Hard together. A Christmas party turned hostage situation laced with one man’s pain and sacrifice for the good of his soon to be ex-wife. What could be more seasonal? And the sequel, sure it’s pretty bad but it only follows naturally, what do you expect us to do; not watch it?
2. Lethal Weapon
Murtough and Riggs: Two cops with only one thing in common, a hate for working in pairs. It’s the story of two of the most dissimilar people on the planet being forced together over the holidays and having to make the best of it. It’s like every family Christmas gathering you’ve ever been to! Throw in a climax leg choke-hold in a jollied up, Christmas lit, suburban neighborhood and you’ve got yourself a Yuletide classic. Bonus points for direction by Richard Donner.
3. Road to Perdition
One of my favorite films of all time. I suppose it’s less a habit of watching this one during the Christmas season than it is watching it all year round, which happens to include the Christmas season. A Christmastime tale of family love, loyalty, and betrayal, all leading up to the greatest use of a Tommy gun in cinema history. Good and evil archetypes are woven into a simple yet seamless story, while every frame remains purposefully shot, and every actor (including my Hombre) chomps away at the chilly set pieces. Set in the winter of 1931 it’s an incredibly moving examination of the powerful relationship between father and son. You know who else was a father and son? God and Jesus.
4. Fellowship of the Ring
The greatest of all three of The Lord of the Rings films. Never let anyone tell you different, and don’t dare refute me. The series holiday release schedule may have sparked its position on this list, but this film’s particular tear-jerking execution of the books greatest promises: themes of friendship, love, sacrifice and death, ensure its survival in the dvd player throughout the cold winter months. You shall not pass through the season without watching this movie at least once.
5. The Proposition
Perhaps the greatest western made in the past decade, it’s not a western at all. Or is it? Well it’s not, but wait – then again – you’re wrong – it is! Get what I mean? Set in the Australian outback it’s far from anywhere that the word “western” might be applicable as a descriptor, just the same it exemplifies the genre keeping all the bells and whistles, style and substance that one would associate with Sergio Leone himself. This tale follows an alienated brother of outlaws as he seeks redemption for himself and his youngest sibling, all the while paralleling the life of an English law enforcement officer struggling to protect and provide for his wife during the Christmas season, in one of the least Christmasy places on earth.
6. In Bruges
One of my new favorites and an instant Christmas classic. Set in Bruges over the holiday, two assassins wrestle over the soul of a young man. A story revolving around judgment and death, it’s themes garner bonus points for intricate reflection upon the concepts of heaven and hell, right and wrong and the true origins of Christmas, Christ and our relation to him.
7.The Bourne Identity
It’s the classic scrooge tale, following a botched mission causing him to lose his memory, a once brainwashed super soldier so deeply enmeshed in the CIA covert ops system only one man knows he’s on our side is forced to come face to face with the reality of just who and what he is, and change his ways in light of the holiday season. It’s a tragic tale concerning lost identity and found purpose, and leads us to one of the greatest questions of our own lives; just who are we really and what is it we’re fighting for? When the Christmas season rolls around are we the person who finds it better to give, or receive?
8. Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang
A throwback to film noir’s golden days, it’s a detective comedy set in LA narrated by Robert Downy Jr. A crazy Christmas caper with Christmas trees, Christmas lights, Christmas hats and other Christmas doodads filling up scenes from the same writer as Lethal Weapon. And Val Kilmer as “Gay Perry”.
9. Batman Returns
I really don’t see the need to explain this one. It’s Christmastime Batman with working Bat-presents. However I will defend its greatness. It’s a film that accepts its established character to such an extent its focus shifts entirely to the villains. A number of movies could learn a thing or two from this film. And it hosts the greatest performance of Michelle Pfeiffer’s life.
10. The Iron Giant
There’s a theory floating around that I created this film myself, and that somewhere in the post development process I simply hit my head so hard I, and every other member of the cast, crew and production just plain forgot. It only stands to reason because it encapsulates everything I love about everything so well. Don’t let my own biases fool you however, it’s an incredibly affecting modern day feature that everyone is sure to enjoy. Despite floundering at the box office upon release, it is one of the most intelligent science fiction movies in recent years, perfectly satirizing the militaristic fear of its 1950’s McCarthyite backdrop. It’s the heart wrenching tale of a boy and his giant weaponized space-invading robot who, with the help of Superman, learns the value of pacifism. Love, fear and sacrifice culminate in this epic story to tell us, We Are Who We Choose To Be.
There is so much snow. So. Much. Snow. It only seemed fitting to end this list with another movie I first experienced with my mother. The overwhelming parka use is enough of a reason to turn this movie on during a brisk winter night, but it’s important to know going in that the comforting images of bundled cast members are the best this movie has to offer in the way of making you feel all warm and tingly inside… well that and Frances McDormand. A wood-chipper? A wood-chipper???
Gremlins. It fell out of the loop a long time ago. It’d be a lie to say I still appreciate it the way you can argue I should. But those things are creepy man.
Super Honorable Mention
Superman The Movie (1978). Please, what list wouldn’t this movie be on? Lets hear it for the greatest portrayal of the person everyone should aspire to be, ever. No not the guy with superpowers who turns back time, the guy who puts everyone else before himself and who always finds time to recognize the partnership with his fellow man. “Don’t thank me warden, we’re all part of the same team.”
Additional Credit to: Nate King
Special Thanks: Nate King
When I was 8 years old I heard something in the living room after everyone had gone to bed, and for one more year I believed in him.
I spent a good portion of today wrapping presents: gifts for nephews and nieces, siblings, parents, and fiancées. When it was all done, and I had cleaned up the extra paper, I looked at the gifts all stacked together. In that moment I remembered a time when I truly believed that not all gifts came from Mom and Dad, but also from a magical old man who wished for me and the other children of the world to have extra happiness on Christmas. I recall the sense of wonder on Christmas Eve as I imagined Santa flying all over that strange world I knew so little about, and feeling that tingle of joy at the thought of him stopping at my house. Every Christmas morning I found evidence of his fantastic visitation. Always there were a few presents from Santa – the real Santa.
I was never told directly that Santa wasn’t a real person. That fact came gradually as I came to understand the world in which I inhabited. For sure, it didn’t help that my siblings were significantly older and far beyond their child-like belief. Perhaps they did little to reinforce the story or assure me that my doubts were unfounded. My young peers would discuss whether or not the jolly old elf actually existed, and it became increasingly difficult to believe.
How could he do it all in one night?
What about poor children?
What about kids who don’t celebrate Christmas?
What about houses that don’t have chimneys?
The questions mounted, and belief gave way to reason. At the tender age of 7, Santa ceased to exist. That is, until Christmas Eve the following year.
When I was 8 years old I heard something in the living room after everyone had gone to bed, and for one more year I believed in him. I opened my door to see if my parents were out there, but they seemed to be fast asleep. The living room was filled with presents along with that special joy found only on Christmas. Perhaps Santa did exist. At that moment I decided that I would believe in the man once again. It wasn’t the kind of evidence that would hold up in court, but for an 8 year old longing to believe, it was all the proof I needed. The real Santa was alive.
Now I buy the gifts, and I see behind the scenes. Santa is me, and he is you. He is a symbol for giving and kindness. To some he is a mere secular distraction— a myth perpetuated by corporations and parents looking for another way to keep their kids in line. To others he is a harmless holiday icon. But who cares what we think? Santa isn’t real to us.
We would do well to ask the children who the real Santa is.
Sometimes something is so obvious and ever-present that we forget it is there, like the sound of the fan inside your computer, or the socks you’re wearing. Like so much white noise, advertising is our barely-noticed constant companion. When you turn on your television, or use the internet, or open a magazine, or move the radio dial, or drive on the highway, or put on a branded piece of clothing, or walk in the city you are taking a bath in the storm of advertising that is soaking the world like a Second Flood. And like the First, it is making it harder to breathe the free air.
There are plenty of people who are more qualified than me when it comes to the issue of advertising as it relates to our society. That being said, I believe I am still able to assess the situation. A lifetime of perpetual exposure to the message of advertising juxtaposed with a well-developed counter-worldview informed by my Christian faith gives me, I am confident, the perspective needed to thoughtfully address this topic.
We live in the age of the 24-hour news cycle. CNN, FOX News, and MSNBC are the three major network news channels. Each also has a presence on the internet. Every day they compile stories to report, experts to analyze, and commentators to express opinions. FOX News is slanted to the right, MSNBC is slanted to the left, and CNN is center-left. These political biases attract different audiences. Each network is aware of their audience and tailors programming to attract more viewers. They are concerned with their ratings. Each day offers a fresh chance to expand their numbers. So, considering the political bias of their audience and the issues that cause people to “stay tuned”, these networks turn to vitriolic speech, violence, and the things that excite the ignoble side of our natures. Anything for the sponsors.
News and advertising should be like oil and water. The news is supposed to report true and relevant information, while advertising is supposed to get you to buy something by manipulating you on some level. News tells you how it is, and advertising tells you how they want you to see it. Unfortunately, news and advertising have bonded together, creating a monster that threatens our true perception of the world. Stories about murderers, rapists, pedophiles, alarming studies, and marital infidelity work to gather up viewers so that when the commercials role, the sponsors have an audience to preach to. On top of this choice selection of mankind’s worst deeds, the networks also infuse an unhealthy dose of political opinion. Talking about how Obama is an anti-American socialist (Glenn Beck) really gets the blood of conservatives going, just like talking about how Scott Brown is a “homophobic, racist, reactionary, ex-nude model, teabagging supporter of violence against woman and against politicians with whom he disagrees”(Keith Olbermann) gets the liberals fired up. All of this hate speech serves to further divide an already divided America. Instead of reaching out and attempting to understand those who believe an opposing ideology, we are being conditioned to view them as the enemy who seeks to destroy our way of life. And this is because it is good for ratings.
Watch this, and then watch specifically at 8:40. What does the host tell Jon Stewart? Then pay attention to the items Wolf Blitzer brings up during the commercial.
Advertising is about showing people that they need the product that you’re selling. You do this by convincing them that they will be happier, healthier, or prettier once they have made the purchase. The Christian idea of being content with what you have, and not comparing yourself to other people, or envying their status or worldly possessions is not compatible with most forms of advertising (Unless you’re selling a book to Christians). Advertisements tell you that you should not be satisfied until you have more X, or better Y. You’ve heard the saying, “keeping up with the Jones’.” Advertising depends on you feeling inadequate next to your neighbor. Now, consider the daily onslaught that we endure from advertisements. Don’t you think day after day, year after year of this message has a significant effect on our perception of ourselves and the world? I know we all like to think that we’re too clever to be fooled by ads, but this kind of incessant indoctrination has to shape our minds, at least somewhat. We look at a country like North Korea with all of its government propaganda and we feel disgusted, but how do we feel about the corporate propaganda that has infiltrated every corner of our lives?
I’m not about to prescribe a cure for virulent advertising. It serves a necessary function in our society. I simply want to address the reality of it, and cause you to think about its presence in our daily lives. What does it do to the integrity of the news? What does it do to our understanding of the world? How does it play into our basest natures?
How will you ride out this storm?